Le Journal

Un randonneur a pu se dégager seul de la masse neigeuse. Les secours ont retrouvé la seconde personne, une femme, qui a été hospitalisée.

After taking a look at Rashan Gary and Elgton Jenkins, our cap casualties series now turns to the offensive backfield. What does the future hold for running back Josh Jacobs? A 2019 first-round pick by the Raiders (with one of the picks they got from Chicago in the Khalil Mack trade in 2018), Jacobs joined the Packers in 2024 as a free agent. Since then, he’s been productive in a high-volume role, carrying the ball 535 times for 2,258 yards and 28 rushing touchdowns over his first two years in Green Bay. Jacobs battled injuries in the second half of the 2025 season, though, and heading into his age 28 season, his cap hit will approach $15 million. With the Packers looking to retool several parts of their roster before a major teardown in 2027, will Jacobs be a part of the picture in 2026? The case for Josh Jacobs Jacobs’ strongest case for remaining in Green Bay is this: he’s doing exactly what the Packers have asked him to do. The Packers clearly wanted a workhorse, bellcow, lead dog, or whatever animal metaphor you prefer when they signed Jacobs, and he’s given them that. Even with the Packers heavily managing his carries in the last month of the season, Jacobs still logged 234 attempts in the regular season, piling up 13 rushing touchdowns.  He also gave the Packers 36 receptions in the passing game, averaging 7.8 yards per catch. It was just the ninth time since 2000 that a Packers back has hit both of those thresholds. It’s also noteworthy that Jacobs’ best days coincided with the Packers’ best team performances. He carried 17 times for 83 yards (4.9 yards per attempt) in the Packers’ Thanksgiving Day romp in Detroit, and he carried 20 times for 86 yards and a touchdown (4.3 yards per attempt) in the Packers 28-21 win over the Bears. Jacobs touched the ball on six of the eight plays on the Packers’ game winning drive, including an impressive 21-yard run on a third down play, and the game-winning touchdown. The case against Josh Jacobs There are deeper issues with Jacobs, though. Jacobs’ volume-based stats look okay in part because the Packers force-fed him the ball throughout the year. On a rate basis, Jacobs’ stats don’t look nearly as good. Jacobs has never been a home run hitter as a ballcarrier, and his stats reflect that, but you have to start wondering at what point his lackluster rate stats are evidence of age-related decline and overall wear-and-tear than just a reflection of his playing style. Let’s start with his yards per carry average. Jacobs averaged just 4.0 per carry this year, the fourth time in his seven-year career that he’s averaged four yards or less per carry. Jacobs was one of 21 players in the NFL to carry the ball at least 200 times this year, and of that group, only three players (Christian McCaffrey, Ashton Jeanty, and Quinshon Judkins) had a worse yards per carry figure. Jacobs’ success rate of 49.1% on rushing plays also was lackluster among his peers. Among that same 21 player group, Jacobs’ success rate ranked 12th, comfortably in the bottom half but ahead of a few notable names, including Christian McCaffrey (48.6), Jahmyr Gibbs (48.1), Saquon Barkley (46.1), and Ashton Jeanty (41). Jacobs has also been measurably worse with the football with the Packers than he was with the Raiders. In silver and black, Jacobs averaged one fumble every 126.5 touches (including playoffs). With the Packers, Jacobs has put the ball on the ground once every 72.3 touches, including twice in two playoff games. Still worse for Jacobs, he’s aging and he’s faced a lot of wear and tear in his NFL career. Next year will be his age-28 season (his birthday is February 11, mark your calendar), and he’s logged more than 2,100 career touches in his seven regular seasons. Sooner or later, those touches are going to add up, and the “sooner” part of that equation becomes more likely every year. Bottom line: Jacobs is expensive and aging, but the Packers seem inclined to invest in him again Jacobs carries a cap hit of…

Pour le WEF, fedpol «a délivré une autorisation de port d'arme de poing à près de 300 personnes».

Plenty of defensive coaches would start salivating at the chance to coach Micah Parsons. That’s the opportunity ahead of whoever ends up being the Green Bay Packers’ next defensive coordinator, and it makes the Packers’ job one of the more intriguing coordinator opportunities currently available. The Packers are well into the interview process for the post that Jeff Hafley vacated when he took the Miami Dolphins’ head coaching job, and the search for a new man to lead the defense will likely stretch into next week. Several candidates have already come through the doors — Jonathan Gannon and Al Harris among the more intriguing names — and former candidate Jim Leonhard could be up next week. Will the Packers have their pick of candidates? They already look like they’ve missed out on one, with Christian Parker likely headed to Dallas. Then there’s also the money question, which has been lingering (and, in some cases, sending certain individuals on the Packers beat into a frenzy on the radio) since Justis Mosqueda dug into the Packers’ trends on the coaching staff a few weeks ago. Hopefully the Packers will empower Matt LaFleur to pay up for whoever he feels the best candidate is, and we’ll likely find out in the next seven days or so. Still, coaches will surely view the Packers job as a great opportunity, especially after seeing the most recent occupant of that position get a job as a head coach last week. 2026 NFL offseason: Ranking the best open coordinator jobs | ESPNThis pair of national writers view the Packers’ DC job as the best such opening in the NFL this offseason. Theory that Packers skimp on assistants’ pay doesn’t add up | Packersnews.comPete Dougherty took a measured response to Justis’ recent piece about coaching pay in Green Bay. Ultimately, however, he talked to just one coaches’ agent and a former Packers scout in an effort to refute the argument that the Packers cheap out on the coaching staff, all while simply using the argument that “it would be strange for the Packers to skimp on coaches when they spend elsewhere” to support his point. At least on that last point, we can all agree that it would be odd, but that argument is not evidence. Is it time for Packers to add veteran help to NFL’s youngest team? | Packers WireGreen Bay was once again the youngest team in the league. But if they want to add veteran leadership this offseason, they’ll have to do so on the margins of the roster since there is precious little cap space to work with. Aaron Kampman dispelled narrative that came with his roots, draft status | Packers.comKampman is a truly great development story: a 5th-round draft pick who became a two-time second-team All-Pro thanks to seasons of 15.5 and 12 sacks. In total, only two of the 24 defensive linemen drafted before him in 2002 had more career sacks than he did. Packers’ Rookie Class Delivers Big, Fat Nothingburger | SI.comWell, sure, this team usually drafts with an eye on players making their impacts in their second and third seasons, not their first. Still, it’s frustrating to see Matthew Golden’s impact in the playoffs come after such light usage during the regular season. Chips ahoy! English beach covered in French fries and onions after cargo ship spill | CNN TravelThis sounded exciting until realizing that they’re all uncooked.

En attirant toutes les lumières, le président américain a peut-être aussi relancé le rendez-vous annuel des élites mondiales.