Comment on Gov. Newsom Funds $33k for Self-Portrait in State Budget, But No Money for Wildfires by Raymond

For those interested in psycho analyzing this scum bag, here is the AI analysis. Personally, I could not care less about Newscum's antics, just his stupid policies: What type of personality results from a mixture of narcissism and megalomania? How does this personality type apply to GAVIN NEWSOM? ChatGPT said: A mix of narcissism (grand self-focus, need for admiration) and megalomania (delusions or fantasies of vast power, importance, or destiny) isn’t a single official diagnosis, but it’s commonly described in a few overlapping ways—depending on how extreme and impairing it is. Here are the main labels you’ll see used: 1. Grandiose Narcissism This is the most common and accurate umbrella term. Inflated sense of self-importance Belief in being exceptional, chosen, or destined for greatness Craves admiration and loyalty Dismissive of criticism May exaggerate achievements or influence Think: “I’m not just special—I’m meant to rule / lead / save / dominate.” 2. Narcissistic Personality Disorder (Grandiose Type) If the traits are persistent, rigid, and damaging to relationships or work, clinicians may consider this diagnosis. Lack of empathy Entitlement Exploitative behavior Fantasies of unlimited success, power, or brilliance Megalomania often shows up here as power fantasies, not necessarily psychosis. 3. Malignant Narcissism (informal but widely used) This is a darker blend sometimes used in psychology literature. Narcissism + aggression + paranoia + lack of remorse Strong “us vs. them” thinking Desire to dominate rather than just be admired This term is descriptive, not diagnostic, but it captures the mix people often mean when they say “narcissist with delusions of grandeur.” 4. Delusional or Psychotic Features (in rare cases) If megalomania crosses into fixed, false beliefs (e.g., believing one literally controls world events or has supernatural powers), clinicians may look beyond personality disorders to: Delusional disorder, grandiose type Bipolar disorder (during manic episodes) Psychotic disorders In those cases, it’s no longer just personality—it’s a break from reality. Plain-English summary Most of the time, a narcissism + megalomania mix is best described as: Grandiose narcissism or, if severe and harmful, Narcissistic Personality Disorder (grandiose or malignant presentation) If you’re asking because you’re trying to understand someone’s behavior (a public figure, a boss, a family member), I can help you map specific traits you’re seeing to these categories—or explain how people like this tend to act in relationships, leadership roles, or under stress. Using Gavin Newsom to illustrate the narcissism + megalomania blend (as observers often describe it) When people point to Gavin Newsom in this context, they’re usually reacting to a style of leadership and self-presentation, not a medical condition. 1. Grandiose Narcissism (the most common frame used) Observers who see this pattern in Newsom often point to: Strong self-focus and confidence in his role on the national stage Comfort positioning himself as a symbol of a larger cause (e.g., “California as the future of America”) Polished charisma and media fluency Framing criticism as ignorance, bad faith, or moral failure This fits what psychologists call grandiose narcissistic traits: High confidence + belief in exceptional status + desire to be seen as historically significant. In plain terms: “I’m not just governing a state—I’m shaping the national future.” 2. Megalomania-lite: Power and Destiny Narratives Where critics bring in megalomania is usually around rhetoric and ambition, not delusion. Examples people cite: Acting as a de facto national opposition leader while still governor Campaign-style messaging aimed beyond California Presenting policies as morally inevitable or historically necessary This reads to critics as: A sense of personal destiny Belief that larger forces revolve around their leadership Framing political disagreements as existential battles Important distinction: This is not psychotic megalomania—it’s political grandiosity, which is extremely common in high-level politicians. 3. Why supporters and critics see him so differently This personality mix creates a sharp split in perception: Supporters see: Confidence Vision Willingness to challenge opponents head-on “Presidential” presence Critics see: Vanity Self-promotion Performative leadership A tendency to govern symbolically rather than pragmatically Same behaviors, radically different interpretations. 4. Malignant Narcissism? Some critics go further and use this term—but psychologists are careful here. Why people say it: Aggressive rhetoric toward opponents Moral absolutism (“we’re right, they’re dangerous”) Willingness to polarize Why clinicians would hesitate: No clear evidence of sadism, paranoia, or loss of reality Behavior remains strategic and reality-based So this label is rhetorical, not clinical. Bottom line (clean and honest) If Gavin Newsom is used as an example in discussions about narcissism + megalomania, the most accurate framing is: Grandiose narcissistic leadership style with strong ambition and power symbolism Not: A mental illness Not delusional megalomania Not a clinical diagnosis This kind of personality is over represented in politics, especially among people positioning themselves for national leadership.