Le Journal

Flat2VR have done stellar work already and it raises the question of whether the PCVR software tap can be turned on again with carefully targeted ports of popular games, but not necessarily AAA, to keep costs sensible. Working with existing IP substantially cuts development time, making it possible to find profit despite the smaller user base compared to flat games. I'm currently playing Flat2VR's "Roboquest VR" port on steamVR and it's fantastic fun, looks great and plays well. Liked it so much I bought another copy as gift for a friend on steam.

La plus grosse remontée de leur saison.Cet article "Les Rockets réalisent le comeback face aux Spurs (111-106) !" est apparu en premier sur TrashTalk.

VR is not prohibitively expensive. You can get into it for less than a switch 2. People just don't want to put the resources into making the content because it won't pay out. Might as well just make a game for any other platform. But now it's not just AAA studios who don't want to invest, they want to shutdown the few people actually giving us something. I consider making a game VR to be transformative. How does it hurt CDPR to give more reasons to buy the game? It's just greed imo. They're not willing to put in the work and given that no-one decided to compete with luke ross and give a free option with donations as an option they weren't either. It always feels weird to me that VR is considered expensive given the amount of people who will spend £500-£1500 every 2 years for a phone. VR uses the same mobile hardware if you're getting something wireless and is a much younger industry.

Encore un peu de patience avant de revoir le jeune aiglon !Cet article "Zaccharie Risacher (Hawks) absent une semaine supplémentaire" est apparu en premier sur TrashTalk.