Le Journal

By Brian Stelter, CNN (CNN) — Early on in her tenure as President Trump’s attorney general, Pam Bondi scrapped a Biden-era policy that banned the Justice Department from pursuing reporters’ phone records and notes while investigating leakers. The message was unmistakable: Trump-era investigators would welcome a confrontation. And now they have one. This week, the Justice Department took the extraordinary step of obtaining a search warrant for Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson’s home. FBI agents arrived early on Wednesday and seized Natanson’s phone, two computers and her Garmin watch. Inside the Washington Post newsroom, the impact was immediate. Reporters called the search “incredibly disturbing” and unprecedented. Natanson met with Post lawyers and security experts, scrambled to line up her own outside legal counsel, and urged her colleagues to keep reporting. The line that was crossed Until now, Gabe Rottman of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press said, the Justice Department had “never executed a search warrant at the home of a reporter in a national security leak case.” But now that the line has been crossed, some journalists and media lawyers expect it will happen again. Trump allies at the Justice Department have been “itching to do this,” a law enforcement reporter told CNN. Bondi’s revised policy, which went into effect last May, weakened her predecessor Merrick Garland’s protections for the press and reflected Trump’s personal frustration with leaks. On Wednesday night, Bondi alleged on Fox News that Natanson’s devices “contain classified material regarding our foreign adversaries, and that’s what we’re looking into now.” The search warrant said the raid was connected to the case of a Maryland contractor who was charged last week with illegally retaining classified records. The Justice Department alleged that the contractor accessed a top-secret intelligence report related to an unnamed foreign country. Courts have repeatedly upheld the rights of journalists to obtain and report on leaked documents, even highly classified ones. But “in modern times, everything about the Espionage Act when it comes to treatment of the press has been based on norms and policy, not law,” national security attorney Mark Zaid told CNN. Since the Trump administration has “discarded policy norms previously set in place by prior administrations,” he said, “there is every reason to believe that what was just experienced by a Washington Post reporter was just the tip of the iceberg of things to come.” ‘A clear effort to intimidate’ Natanson was one of six Post reporters who published an exclusive story last week about Venezuela, citing secret government documents obtained by the Post. Natanson also reported extensively on Trump’s overhaul of the federal government, drawing on tips from sources inside federal agencies. She encouraged people to message her on Signal, the encrypted messaging app. A Post spokesperson declined to comment on whether the Post is taking legal action to try to limit the government’s ability to access Natanson’s work materials. But the Post’s top editor, Matt Murray, told staffers on Thursday that “the whole company is working in a myriad of ways” to support Natanson and defend the publication’s work. And an influential First Amendment advocacy group, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, has asked a federal judge to unseal the DOJ’s applications to search Natanson’s home. Because the records are currently sealed, the public has no way “to understand the government’s basis for seeking (and a federal court’s basis for approving) a search with dramatic implications for a free press and the constitutional rights of journalists,” the Reporters Committee’s lawyers wrote in their filing late Wednesday. Under more ordinary circumstances, federal investigators investigating a leak of government secrets might seek a subpoena for reporters’ records. Past subpoenas have triggered lengthy legal…

Por Tami Luhby, CNN El presidente Donald Trump presentó este jueves una propuesta integral con el objetivo de reducir los precios de los medicamentos recetados y las primas de los seguros de salud, así como aumentar la transparencia en los precios. También prometió que exigirá responsabilidad a las grandes compañías de seguros. El plan, que el presidente insta al Congreso a aprobar, propone enviar dinero directamente a los consumidores, en lugar de a las aseguradoras, como ha defendido en los últimos meses en medio del debate sobre la extensión de los subsidios mejorados para las primas de la Ley de Cuidado de Salud Asequible (ACA), que expiraron a finales del año pasado. Muchas de las propuestas ya han sido impulsadas por Trump o por el Congreso en los últimos años. Algunas se basan en medidas que el presidente implementó durante su primer mandato o en acuerdos que alcanzó el año pasado, incluyendo la solicitud a los legisladores de que codifiquen sus acuerdos de precios de medicamentos de “Nación Más Favorecida” con más de una docena de fabricantes farmacéuticos. Esta es una noticia en desarrollo y será actualizada. The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved. The post Trump presenta un plan de atención médica para reducir costos appeared first on KRDO.

Riccardo Minghetti, 16 ans, lycéen à Rome, fait partie des six Italiens décédés la nuit du nouvel an dans l'incendie du bar Le Constellation. Ses professeurs lui rendent hommage.

Le policier âgé de 45 ans a reconnu « l'ensemble des six faits ». Le parquet a requis son placement en détention provisoire.

L'origine de l'explosion est encore inconnue. Les secours sont actuellement sur place, dans le centre d'Utrecht.