Le Journal

Waste Of The Day: Texas Southern Univ. Spending, Inventory In Shambles

C1 : Marseille et Monaco sur la sellette, Arsenal et le Bayern qualifiés d’office pour les huitièmes

Operation Of Australia's Largest Coal Power Station Extended To 2029

Oklo Upgraded At BofA On Meta Deal

EL : Programme TV et résultats de la 7e journée
7e journée de l'Europa League : Jeudi 22 janvier 18h45 : Fenerbahçe - Aston Villa (sur Canal+ Foot)Bologne - Celtic Glasgow (sur Canal+ Live)PAOK Salonique - Betis Séville (sur Canal+ Live)BSC Young Boys - Olympique Lyonnais (pas de diffusion en France)FC Viktoria Plzen - FC Porto (sur Canal+ Live)...

« Le gardien préférait comme ça » : Roberto De Zerbi charge Gerónimo Rulli sur le but de Liverpool
Hugo Ekitike a broyé l’OM, Samir Nasri applaudit

Fraud Is 'Fundamental' Part Of Child Transgender Medical Field

Trump Right About Arctic Security, NATO's Rutte Says
Trump Right About Arctic Security, NATO's Rutte Says In what could have been the starting gun of Trump's de-escalation, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said today at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, that the US President was right about security in the Arctic. “When it comes to the Arctic, I think President Trump is right. Other leaders in NATO are right. We need to defend the Arctic,” the former Dutch prime minister said. “We know that the sea lanes are opening up.” Rutte said that China and Russia were becoming increasingly active in the Arctic Circle, and acknowledged that this posed a problem for the alliance. “There are eight countries bordering on the Arctic. Seven are members of NATO. That’s Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Canada, and the U.S.,” Rutte said. “And there’s only one country bordering on the Arctic outside NATO, and that’s Russia. And I would argue there is a ninth country, which is China, which is increasingly active in the Arctic region. So, President Trump and other leaders are right, we have to do more there, we have to protect the Arctic.” Furthermore, as Guy Birchall reports for The Epoch Times, Rutte also praised Trump for upping the contributions from many NATO member states to the alliance’s budget. “Do you really think that without Donald Trump, eight big economies in Europe, including Spain, Italy, and Belgium, Canada, by the way, also outside Europe, would have come to 2 percent in 2025 when they were only on 1.5 percent at the beginning of the year?” Rutte said. “No way. Without Donald Trump, this would never have happened. They are all on 2 percent now.” NATO's Rutte: I know many of you criticize Trump. But do you really think that, without Trump, eight big economies in Europe—including Spain, Italy, and Belgium—and Canada would have reached the two-percent defense spending target in 2025? At the beginning of the year, they… pic.twitter.com/KVmv0J6hXO — Clash Report (@clashreport) January 21, 2026 Rutte’s comments about NATO’s presence in the Arctic come as Trump’s stated ambition of annexing Greenland has driven a wedge between Washington and European allies. Before departing for the summit, Trump expressed confidence that NATO and the United States would reach a deal on the Arctic island that benefits all parties. “I think that we will work something out where NATO is going to be very happy and where we’re going to be very happy,” Trump said during a Jan. 20 White House press conference. “We need it for national security and even world security. It’s very important.” U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Second Lady Usha Vance tour the U.S. military's Pituffik Space Base in Greenland on March 28, 2025. Jim Watson/AP During his speech in Davos, the president ruled out taking the island by force but remained forthright in his insistence that the United States must acquire the territory. “People thought I would use force, but I don’t have to use force. I don’t want to use force. I won’t use force,” Trump said. “We want a piece of ice for world protection, and they won’t give it. They have a choice: They can say yes, and we will be very appreciative, or you can say no, and we will remember.” Trump also said that Denmark promised to spend “over $200 million to strengthen Greenland’s defenses” and that it has “spent less than 1 percent of that.” He was referring to a 2019 commitment from the Danish government, made during his first presidency, when the idea of the United States taking control of the territory was first raised. Copenhagen has not disputed that the implementation of that commitment has been slow. Tyler Durden Wed, 01/21/2026 - 17:20
Pavard catastrophique, l'OM lui montre la sortie
De retour dans le onze de l’OM après avoir manqué le déplacement à Angers samedi soir, Benjamin Pavard s’est totalement manqué contre Liverpool. L’international français a perdu beaucoup de crédit. Prêté avec option d’achat par l’Inter Milan, Benjamin Pavard a été recruté par l’Olympique de Marseill...

Twice Bitten, Thrice Shy: What Oil Majors Want Before Betting On Venezuela A Third Time
Twice Bitten, Thrice Shy: What Oil Majors Want Before Betting On Venezuela A Third Time Authored by Kevin Stocklin via The Epoch Times, President Donald Trump has encouraged American oil companies to reinvest $100 billion in Venezuela to spur energy production and to rescue Venezuelans from desperate poverty. Oil companies, however, are taking stock of the decrepit state of Venezuela’s energy infrastructure after decades of communism, and seeing a number of critical impediments. “We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies—the biggest anywhere in the world—go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure,” Trump stated in a Jan. 11 press conference following a meeting with top oil executives. Venezuela has the world’s largest known oil reserves, estimated by rating agency S&P at 300 billion barrels, which are located in a region along the Orinoco River called the Orinoco Belt. At its peak—and with investment and expertise from oil majors including Exxon Mobil, ConocoPhillips, Chevron, BP, Total, and Norway’s Statoil—Venezuela produced more than 3 million barrels per day and was America’s largest foreign supplier. America’s gulf coast refineries were built to process the heavy sour crude from Venezuela, and they can refine it much more efficiently than the light crude produced from fracking. But trade with Venezuela slowed to a trickle after then-president Hugo Chavez seized the assets of western oil companies in 2007, leading to the imposition of U.S. sanctions. Since Venezuela’s wells and other equipment were nationalized, output collapsed by about 70 percent and is currently less than 1 million barrels per day, according to statistics website Worldometer. Venezuela thus presents a massive opportunity for Western oil companies to rebuild what had once been a top global oil producer. But daunting problems remain. “Commercially, the upside is long-life reserves, portfolio diversification, and service and infrastructure opportunities if the country becomes investable again,” Jason Isaac, CEO of the American Energy Institute, told The Epoch Times. “But the investment case only works if companies can actually control operations, get paid, and move barrels transparently—otherwise the ‘gain’ is trapped capital and political risk.” Venezuela Currently ‘Uninvestable’ On Jan. 9, Exxon Mobil CEO Darren Woods expressed little enthusiasm for an immediate return to Venezuela, stating in a meeting hosted by Trump at the White House that the country, in its current state, is “uninvestable.” “We’ve had our assets seized there twice,” Woods said. “And so, you can imagine to re-enter a third time would require some pretty significant changes from what we’ve historically seen here and what is currently the state.” In an aerial view, the Exxon Mobil Baytown Refinery is seen in Baytown, Texas, on Jan. 13, 2026. President Donald Trump has threatened to sideline Exxon Mobil from Venezuela's energy market after expressing that he "didn't like Exxon's response," while making a push for oil companies to begin investing there. Exxon remains interested and is prepared to send a team to assess the existing oil infrastructure. Brandon Bell/Getty Images Patrick Pouyanne, CEO of Total, likewise said that he would consider investing in Venezuela again at some point, but it is “not high on my agenda.” Venezuela first expropriated the assets of western oil companies in the 1970s and again in 2007. By contrast to many governments in the Middle East and Africa that had done the same, Venezuela refused to compensate oil companies for their losses, leading the companies to sue and win in U.S. and international courts, claiming damages of around $60 billion. Oil companies will likely want these claims to be paid before putting new money into Venezuela, but the country has little means to do so. Oil production has dwindled to less than 1 million barrels per day and, even at that level, still comprise about two-thirds of the…

